PRICING
Bridging the gap between research, teachers and EdTech
Free courses for teachers and EdTech
Our mission is simple at WhatWorked, to bridge the gap between research, teachers and EdTech to advance learning. It will not be possible to build an evidence base for what works without supporting teachers to robustly test interventions in their classrooms.
In 2023, we have released the EdTech Standards of Evidence course to help provide teachers and EdTech companies with the knowledge and framework to engage critically with evidence.
The interventions section of this website will link to the cumulative school evidence website launching in the summer 2023. At present, our pilot peer tutor programmes are available for schools to access.
In 2023, we have released the EdTech Standards of Evidence course to help provide teachers and EdTech companies with the knowledge and framework to engage critically with evidence.
The interventions section of this website will link to the cumulative school evidence website launching in the summer 2023. At present, our pilot peer tutor programmes are available for schools to access.
EdTech Pricing
At WhatWorked, we are working with EdTech providers to help develop their evidence base for impact.
We love to talk about evidence and the occassional cup of coffee, so please drop us a message using the contact form below to schedule a 30 minute virtual call.
We love to talk about evidence and the occassional cup of coffee, so please drop us a message using the contact form below to schedule a 30 minute virtual call.
Write your awesome label here.
Request a call back / email
Thank you!
Frequently asked questions
Why do you have three different evaluations which teachers can use?
We only provide the guidance for teachers to help support your own professional judgement on which evaluation will work best in your school. If you just want to see how your learners respond to the intervention (e.g. peer tutoring), then teacher observations can be used (1 star rating). If you then include the pre- and post-test in your implementation then it will provide an indication if this improves attainment (2 star rating). However, as you will learn in the EdTech Standards of Evidence course, this is a single group design so it does have limitations. If you decide to use a mini-RCT evaluation, whereby you create a control group who receive the intervention but only after the post-test, this will give the most robust data for the impact of the intervention in your school. We complete the analysis for you and you receive an effect size for the impact and your data contributes to the live evidence base for that specific intervention.
If I sign up to test a free intervention, will WhatWorked complete the analysis?
Yes, if you decide to run the intervention as a mini-RCT or single group pre or post-test we will complete the analysis of your data. However, as with all interventions on the WhatWorked website, you will need to register in advance of starting your programme for your analysis to be completed. This cannot be completed retrospectively.
Do you need ethical approval for the mini-RCTs in your school?
All the data you submit is anonymised and ethical approval is granted at school level. We believe that until we know interventions work, it is not ethical to not test this robustly, or to check regularly that the interventions still work as intended. All mini-RCTs eventually provide the intervention to all students, this is just not at the same time.
Company Number 12789441
Copyright © 2022
Copyright © 2022
Created with
